TL;DR
Get gifts for the two of you delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A Gottman Institute report recounts how Mike and Lynne tried a different approach after conflict over how often they wanted sex: Lynne led sensual evenings focused on massage and touch without an expectation of intercourse. The report says her desire gradually increased and the couple eventually had sex about twice a week; it does not provide independent verification or a broader clinical study of the approach.
The Gottman Institute describes how a couple, identified as Mike and Lynne, tried to ease conflict over mismatched sexual desire by shifting their shared evenings toward massage and touch without an expectation of intercourse. The report says Lynne’s desire gradually increased and that they eventually had sex about twice a week, though it offers one couple’s account rather than evidence that the approach will work for others.
According to the report, Mike wanted sex several times a week, while Lynne felt that once every other week was enough. Mike brought home books and erotica hoping to arouse her. Lynne experienced his efforts as pressure to have sex, and his growing frustration and insistence left her feeling less interested. By the time they attended a Gottman workshop, the couple did not know how to change the pattern.
At the workshop, relationship researcher John Gottman recommended that they focus on sensuality rather than intercourse and let Lynne guide their time together. She chose a massage book she liked and led evenings of massage and other touching. The report says the couple agreed to spend time touching without having sex, creating room for affection without requiring either person to take the next step.
The account says Lynne’s desire gradually rose and that the couple eventually had sex about twice a week. It does not give a timeframe for that change, report how long the couple had been together, or describe how the outcome was measured. The example is presented as a couple’s experience, not as a controlled test or a prediction about other relationships.
A Lower-Pressure Route to Intimacy
The report highlights a common relationship tension: partners can want different amounts of sex, and repeated attempts to close that gap may make intimacy feel less comfortable. In this account, Mike’s efforts to increase desire had the opposite effect for Lynne because she experienced them as pressure. The proposed change was not to set a target for sex, but to make affectionate touch possible without a promise that it would lead to intercourse.
That distinction may matter to couples who find that an invitation to intimacy feels like an obligation. Agreeing on what an evening does and does not involve can make expectations clearer and give each partner room to express preferences. It also shifts attention from counting sexual encounters toward communication and mutual comfort. The story does not establish that massage or any other specific practice increases desire for everyone; it shows how one couple described changing their dynamic.
Popular right now
Vitamix Propel Series 510 Professional-Grade Blender, 3 Programs, Black
Hisense 85 U7 Mini-LED ULED 4K UHD Smart Google TV (85U7SG, 2026)
Ninja Crispi Glass Air Fryer (Stone) – 4‑in‑1
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From Sexual Expectations to Touch
The Gottman Institute report connects the couple’s difficulty to the vulnerability involved in discussing sex. Drawing on Gottman’s book What Makes Love Last?, it describes fear of rejection and shame as factors that can make partners reluctant to ask for what they want or say what they do not want. A request for different touch can also be misread as criticism of a partner’s past behavior.
The report presents sensual touch as a broad category that can include holding, kissing or massage without an expectation of intercourse or orgasm. It recommends that partners agree in advance when they want to keep an evening to touching, and that each person be able to say what feels good and safe. The point in the account is to remove guesswork about whether one partner expects the evening to progress further.
It also draws on the idea of a sexual “Love Map”: knowledge of a partner’s preferences, what helps them feel ready for intimacy, and what they would rather avoid. The report suggests asking about these preferences as positive requests rather than as criticism. Partners may have different tastes; the account frames learning about those differences as a conversation, not a judgment of either person’s desirability or skill.
“Shift their focus from sex to sensuality.”
— Gottman Institute report, describing John Gottman’s recommendation
Limits of the Couple’s Account
The supplied report does not state when the account was published, how long Mike and Lynne followed the massage routine, or how long it took for Lynne’s desire to change. It also does not explain whether the couple’s eventual pattern of sex twice a week lasted or whether other changes in their relationship contributed.
The account does not present clinical data, a comparison group or a finding that this approach is effective across couples. It is not clear whether Mike and Lynne are pseudonyms or what additional support they received. The report’s account should be read as an illustration of one couple’s experience, not a guarantee of an outcome or a substitute for individualized professional help when a couple is distressed.
The report recommends that couples begin with a small number of questions and take turns speaking and listening without judgment. Examples include asking what felt good the last time they were intimate, what helps each partner feel relaxed, and what they need to feel comfortable saying no. Partners can move slowly if a topic feels embarrassing, and the listener can ask follow-up questions before offering advice.
If both partners want to try something new, the report suggests agreeing on one thing to explore and discussing afterward how it felt. Couples may also make time for affection without scheduling intercourse, allowing anticipation and closeness to develop without turning a planned evening into a sexual obligation. The source does not report a later update on Mike and Lynne or set out a next milestone for the couple.
Key Questions
What did Mike and Lynne change?
According to the Gottman Institute report, they shifted from trying to increase sexual activity directly to evenings of massage and touch without an expectation of intercourse. Lynne chose and led the activity.
How often did the couple eventually have sex?
The report says they eventually had sex about twice a week. It does not say how long the change took or whether that frequency continued.
Does the report show that massage will increase desire for other couples?
No. It describes one couple’s experience and does not provide a clinical trial or evidence that the same approach will have the same effect for others.
What does the report mean by sensual touch?
It describes touch such as massage, holding or kissing that can be enjoyable without a requirement that it lead to intercourse or orgasm. Partners are encouraged to agree on boundaries and expectations beforehand.
What can partners ask each other about intimacy?
The report suggests questions about what feels good, what helps each person feel relaxed or ready for touch, and what makes it comfortable to say no. It recommends listening without judgment and raising preferences as positive requests rather than complaints.
Source: gottman.com
