TL;DR
A personal essay published by The Good Men Project describes its author’s physical distress after unexpectedly seeing a person they identify as a narcissist. It questions whether grey rock, DEEP and strategic flattery are safe or effective in ongoing abusive relationships, but provides personal interpretation rather than clinical evidence or independently verified guidance.
The Good Men Project published a personal essay questioning whether popular strategies for dealing with narcissistic people can protect someone in an ongoing harmful relationship. The writer recounts becoming physically distressed after unexpectedly seeing a person they had not encountered for more than a year, then argues that grey rock, DEEP and strategic flattery may fail or keep a person exposed to abuse; the piece is a personal account, not clinical research.
Get gifts for the two of you delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
The author describes standing at a party and talking with other guests when they noticed the person pass by. They report a sudden rush of physical symptoms, including a pounding heartbeat, ringing, disorientation and difficulty regaining their breath. Later, the writer sat by a lake to recover. The essay says the encounter happened after more than a year without seeing the person face to face, and that the writer’s immediate attempt to act as if nothing had happened did not conceal their reaction from another guest.
The incident prompted the author to think about three approaches often discussed in communities supporting people who have experienced difficult relationships. Grey rock means limiting emotional responses and conversation; DEEP stands for “don’t defend, don’t engage, don’t explain, don’t personalise.” The third approach, as the essay describes it, is offering measured admiration to try to prevent conflict. The author says these approaches did not work for them in the circumstances they describe.
The essay’s criticism is specific to the writer’s experience. They say visible stress can make emotional detachment difficult, and that advice not to take remarks personally can be hard to follow when someone knows a person’s vulnerabilities. They also warn that focusing on appearing calm may become a sustained performance, while a strategy that reduces confrontation could leave a person in a harmful situation. The supplied source excerpt ends during its discussion of flattery, so its full argument and any concluding advice are not available here.
When Coping Advice May Fall Short
The essay draws attention to a difference between managing a difficult interaction and becoming safer. A person may be able to limit an argument in the moment without changing the underlying relationship or stopping harmful conduct. The author’s central warning is that de-escalation is not the same as protection, particularly if someone is expected to use a technique while continuing to live with or regularly encounter the other person.
That distinction matters because advice shared online can sound universal even when it is based on particular experiences. A strategy that helps one person end a conversation may not suit someone facing a different pattern of behavior, power imbalance or safety risk. The essay offers a reason to assess whether an approach is helping the person using it—not just whether it appears to keep the other person calm.
Readers should not treat the author’s account as a clinical assessment of the person described or as proof that these techniques always fail. The article does not report research, interviews with specialists or evidence comparing methods. Its value is as a first-person account of distress and a critique of advice the writer says they tried.
Popular right now
Dyson V8 Cordless Vacuum
KitchenAid Artisan 5-Qt Tilt-Head Stand Mixer, KSM150PS, Almond Cream
Vitamix Touch & Go Advance 32-Ounce Bar Blender, White
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Encounter Behind the Essay
The source is an essay titled “How to Survive Being Around a Narcissist,” published by The Good Men Project. Its opening scene is a social gathering. The author says they expected the person they feared seeing would be unlikely to attend, because the person avoided gatherings of that kind. The writer was initially relaxed and talking with other guests before spotting them passing by.
After the encounter, the author recalled grey rock and DEEP, then considered a third approach involving restrained praise. The essay shifts from that single party episode to the writer’s account of trying different approaches with their mother, including reduced contact. They say they eventually felt these efforts were making the situation slightly less painful rather than protecting them. That is the writer’s interpretation; the source excerpt does not provide independent details about the family relationship.
The term “narcissist” in the essay is not accompanied by a documented diagnosis. The supplied text does not establish whether the person described has narcissistic personality disorder, and it does not identify them. The article’s claims about how such people respond to stress, boundaries or praise are presented as the author’s conclusions, not as findings verified by the source material.
““There are techniques for exactly this. Grey rock. DEEP. All of it.””
— The essay’s author
Limits of the Available Account
The source material does not give a publication date, identify the author in the supplied excerpt or provide independent confirmation of the events described. It also does not establish a diagnosis for the person the writer calls a narcissist. Those distinctions matter: the article reports one person’s experience and interpretation, not a clinical determination about another person.
The provided text cuts off during the section on flattery. It is therefore unclear how the full essay develops that argument, whether it offers other options, or whether it provides advice about seeking outside support. No expert commentary, study results or specific safety plan appears in the supplied material. The effectiveness and risks of the strategies for people in different circumstances remain unestablished by this source.
What Readers Can Take From It
The source material reports no follow-up event or planned next step. The development is the publication of the essay itself. Readers looking for guidance should distinguish the writer’s personal account from individualized professional advice, especially when a relationship involves fear, coercion or a risk of harm.
If someone feels unsafe, they can contact a trusted person or a local domestic-abuse service to discuss options suited to their circumstances; immediate danger warrants contacting local emergency services. Any decision about reducing contact or setting a boundary may depend on practical and safety factors not covered in the essay. The article’s broader point is that a coping technique should not be mistaken for a substitute for safety or support.
Key Questions
What happened in the essay?
The author says they became physically distressed after unexpectedly seeing a person they had not seen face to face for more than a year at a party. The encounter led them to reconsider coping techniques they had tried or encountered.
Which strategies does the essay discuss?
It discusses grey rock, which aims to limit emotional engagement; DEEP, meaning “don’t defend, don’t engage, don’t explain, don’t personalise”; and measured admiration intended to avoid conflict.
Does the source prove these methods do not work?
No. The essay presents the author’s personal experience and argument. The supplied material includes no clinical research or comparison of these methods across different situations.
Does the article confirm that the person has a diagnosis?
No. The supplied excerpt does not document a diagnosis. “Narcissist” is the author’s description, and the source does not establish that the person has narcissistic personality disorder.
What should someone do if they feel unsafe?
Consider contacting a trusted person or a local domestic-abuse support service to discuss options specific to the situation. If there is immediate danger, contact local emergency services.
Source: goodmenproject.com
![A Better Way To Tie Your Gym Shorts. (Or Any Drawstring) [Video]](https://howgetdivorce.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/a-better-way-to-tie-your-gym-shorts-or-any-drawstring-video-featured-380x200.jpg)
